boats and weapons

edit

A simple thing for a good writer to add would be a listing of boats and weapon types plus a synopis of the story.--Xiahou 01:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced reception

edit

JimmyBlackwing, not sure if this one has anything legit, or if it's just more OR. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 03:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

VP:VG article reassessment (20 September 2023)

edit

This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.

Category Flag Comments
Overall   The article generally meets the form of the manual of style but has minor issues, such as gaps in its content or missing elements, or requires greater editing to assist in clarity, balance and flow.
Layout  Y The article has a layout with sections that conforms to all the foundational sections of the manual of style.
Lead section    The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox  Y The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay    The article contains a description of gameplay, but is either insufficient to cover a clear description of the game or has excessive or trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art  Y The article contains a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot  Y The article contains a plot section of appropriate length, from an external perspective, focused on describing the key events in a playthrough of the game.
Development  Y The article contains a development section that is focused on the design and release of the game.
Reception    The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia. The article may also benefit from a review aggregator score and ratings template if appropriate.
Sources    The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.

VRXCES (talk) 12:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply