Talk:Blue Pill (software)

(Redirected from Talk:Blue Pill (malware))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Laced8


I tried references 3,4,5 and 6 and none of them would load or produce something that wasn't a 404. Reference 2 successfully linked to an article but it was just a random news release about a shipment of chips being 6-8 weeks delayed, nothing related to the reference description.

Reference 1 isn't a link but rather aDOI citation. This article has problems. -%%%% — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laced8 (talkcontribs) 11:37, 15 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

Why is this article titled malware? It is a proof of concept of an exploit, not a malware. No party will be interested to install this particular program secretly on your computer, although they may use the idea to create a program that actually does something to generate them money. --84.178.109.58 00:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The definition on here for malware is "software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the owner's informed consent", which I think sums this up pretty well (it does infiltrate the system). --Zootm 10:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
According to the author of the Blue Pill it is not malware but a technology that will make it possible to introduce malware to the system.
The technology is also not OS-specific and could be used on any OS.
Here are some quotes from her blog (http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2006_07_01_archive.html and http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_archive.html):
"There are number of ways of how Blue Pill could be exploited to create the actual malware (Blue Pill itself is just a "hijacking technology", not a malware)"
"I would like to make it clear, that the Blue Pill technology does not rely on any bug of the underlying operating system. I have implemented a working prototype for Vista x64, but I see no reasons why it should not be possible to port it to other operating systems, like Linux or BSD which can be run on x64 platform."

effectiveness

edit

The article is incomplete. Now that it's source was released, did those guys from 2007 ever run it against their detector suite? -- Sy / (talk) 00:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The "Red Pill" URL reference leads to an explanation of the Red/Blue pill concept as in the movie The Matrix, but not a similar software package as implied by the text. Tim-mnm (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Detecting virtualization != detecting Blue Pill

edit

No time to fix the article at the moment but see this blog post: http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2007/08/virtualization-detection-vs-blue-pill.html

The page should be modified to reflect the point clarified there. —Jemmytc 19:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Blue Pill (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Blue Pill (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Blue Pill (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)Reply