Talk:Bomakellia

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animals Low‑importance

Bomakellia is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Unreliable images

Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Images added to any article should be encyclopaedic. Any artistic representation should be based upon WP:RS and be Verifiable. I do not see any evidence to make me believe the images in this article meet that criterion, and I feel that the page would be better served without them (unless they can be shown to be based upon proper scientific research). For these reasons I propose to remove the images until sources are provided which justify their inclusion. Nick Moyes (talk) 02:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

So you're going to go on a campaign of spite to have me run out of Wikipedia, too, like all of my other critics? I mean, I did base both illustration from the sources in the article, but, that's never good enough for those of my critics who want me run out of Wikipedia on a rail. I mean, all of the people who say and want all artistic representations of anything removed from all Wikipedia articles for not being properly sourced have, in practice, only wanted my artistic representations removed from Wikipedia.--Mr Fink (talk) 03:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

By the way, do you plan to try and humiliate me like this on all of the talkpages of articles that use my art?--Mr Fink (talk) 05:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is an unfounded false statement. The reconstruction of Bomakellia as a proto-arthropod is based on B. Waggoner's reconstruction and corresponded to the original M. Fedonkin's description ( https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article-pdf/45/2/190/19501692/45-2-190.pdf ). Frond-like reconstruction is based on the opinion of J. Dzik ( https://www.paleo.pan.pl/people/Dzik/Publications/ctenophoraDzik.pdf ) The Mr Fink's reconstructions are quite adequate and accurate. Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC))Reply

Add topic