Talk:1992 Bosnian independence referendum

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosnian independence referendum, 1992. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110529223410/http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf to http://207.57.19.226/journal/Vol3/No1/art12-13.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bosnian independence referendum, 1992. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522132353/http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=UserGroups.Home&ContentRecord_id=250&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=5&Subaction=ByDate to http://csce.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=UserGroups.Home&ContentRecord_id=250&ContentType=G&ContentRecordType=G&UserGroup_id=5&Subaction=ByDate

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Neutrality?

We have the core Wiki standard of NPOV and it is completely ignored in this and many other articles on the topic of Yugoslav wars. There is a constant talk of agression, which is blunt one-sided presentation of the topic. Mm.srb (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

I did not find a single mention of aggression in this article. Could you please be more specific? Surtsicna (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

That is because I only recently deleted it, which gave me reason enough to suspect the breaking of NPOV. Same goes for the page Bosnia and Herzegovina, with Serbs and Croats credited as "Serbs" and "Croats" in the history section. Mm.srb (talk)

What you recently deleted was a direct quote from the source. I do not see how it fails NPOV. If you ask me, attacking someone is rather aggressive. Surtsicna (talk) 15:01, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Reverse logic; there are tens of sources saying that Skenderbeg is of Serbian origin, but they are not quoted on Wikipedia. Wonder why? Using one source on a sensitive matter (plus, that pseudo-characterization is aiming at a bigger game) and quoting it in the text as a fact, without apostrophizing that it is, in fact, the opinion or of the author, is a direct misuse of Wikipedia, because one author's opinion or assessment is used to verify daily political rhetorics and to illustrate the standpoint of one side on the terrible events from recent history. There is no NPOV in that. Mm.srb (talk) 16:07, 30 March 2019 (UTC)