Talk:Bowling Green massacre
(Redirected from Talk:Bowling Green Massacre)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Paragon Deku in topic Is the infobox needed?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bowling Green massacre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Bowling Green massacre. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Bowling Green massacre at the Reference desk. |
 | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments before commenting. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 March 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | A fact from Bowling Green massacre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Is the infobox needed?
editI get that it’s amusing to have an infobox say “fictional attack” and list no casualties, but is the article actually improved by having this information framed in an infobox? It should be obvious from the lede that the attack was fictional, and obviously would have no casualties. Paragon Deku (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Remove it.--Jack Upland (talk) 01:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)