This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I think the company's name is B&T and not Brügger & Thomet anymore. The full name is nowhere to be fund on their company web page. Company brochures do not mention Mr. Thomet any more, he is only referred to as "a partner". See this: [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.231.211.94 (talk) 09:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply
The article should definitely say that the company name is now B&T AG, and I believe the article titles for their products could be changed from, for example, "Brügger & Thomet MP9" to "B&T MP9", with out being nondescript. However, "B&T AG" is a nondescript article name. But this would cause a lack of consistency if the products' articles are moved, and I don't know whether this is allowable within Wikipedia rules.
I also think it is worth mentioning that Mr Thomet is now listed as "a partner", especially if anyone knows the reason. (Though the name change and "a partner" wording make it sound like Mr Brügger and Mr Thomet "fell out", to put it simply.) RadiculousJ (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply