Talk:2007–08 Bradford City A.F.C. season/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Good quality, flows well

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   No obviously broken links or inaccurate refs

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   No discernable OR

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Appears well written with NPOV by what appears to be a person well versed in Bradford City

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Peanut is hte only editor therefore edit wars are impossible, well done for avoiding them though ;)

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Article could do with more images overall, the artilce would not imo reach the FA criteria for images currently

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Congratulations on building this article from the ground up, it is a first class poece of work and you are to be commended on it.

06:16, 17 July 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigHairRef (talk • contribs)