Talk:Brasileirinho
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 29 January 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.
result: Move logs: source title · target title
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
– The 1947 song has greater long-term significance than the 2005 documentary, which should suffice for establishing the primary topic (WP:PT2). That's because the documentary is titled after or as homage to the song and it is about the music genre of which the song is a standard. The 2005 release of the film did not influence much the popularity of the term in English sources, according to the Google Ngram viewer [1]. Finally, the song has three times more incoming links in Wikipedia (13 versus 4, after excluding the links in transclusions of a template about the film director):
edit: googling for the ambiguous title along with the song composer name and searching for the title and the film director name yields ten times more hits for the song than the film:
fgnievinski (talk) 07:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: pages with content, such as Brasileirinho, are ineligible as new titles in move requests unless they, too, are proposed to be renamed. Brasileirinho → Brasileirinho (disambiguation) was added to this request as a result of that requirement. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'r there 14:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose for reasons stated by other editors in objecting to the attempt to do this as an uncontroversial technical move. "Brasileirinho is" test in Gbooks, and ["was" test don't indicate any primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi do you realize the song is mentioned in all hits of your "was" test? fgnievinski (talk) 21:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. No such user (talk) 12:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)