Talk:Breathing (Jason Derulo song)/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 19:49, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Infobox

edit
  • Provide an ALT text for the cover.   Done

Lead

edit
  • was well received → garnered positive reviews   Done

Background and release

edit
  • You can link DJ Frank E as it is the first time he is mentioned in the body of prose.   Done
  • Link synth   Done
  • and three remixes of "Breathing" → Because of how you have constructed this sentence, you need a comma after "Breathing"   Done

Composition

edit
  • According to the digital sheet music published at Musicnotes.com by Universal Music Publishing Group, → Not needed, remove.   Done
  • and contains elements of the song "Pilentze Pee", → In the lead you say sample.   Done
  • As quite a lot of this section is about the lyrics, I'd change this section to "Composition and lyrics".   Done

Critical reception

edit
  • This is full of quotes. Can you paraphrase some? I'd try the quote - paraphrased quote - quote method lol.   Done

Chart performance

edit
  • eventually certified → Remove "eventually"   Done

Music video

edit
  • No issues.

Live performances and cover versions

edit
  • No issues.

Track listing

edit
  • I'd change this to "Formats and track listings" as there are different formats in which it was available.   Done

Credits and personnel

edit
  • No issues

Charts and certifications

edit
  • The Weekly Charts table isn't weekly if you include two different years, that yearly. Also, 2011 peaks should be on one table, 2012 peaks in the other table.   Done

Release history

edit
  • I did a slight c/e of the tables.
  • Could you add a Label column too.   Done

References

edit
  • Check for words that are in capitals, they should just be written normally. (FN46)   Done

Summary

edit

Quite impressed! References are practically perfect. Article is really well written. Good job! On hold

Passing, well done :) Aaron You Da One 13:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply