Talk:British military narrow-gauge railways

Possible military railway

There used to be a railway (still is??) on Hoo Salt Marsh, an island in the Medway Estuary. Anyone know of a military connection? Mjroots (talk) 14:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I believe this is the one listed as "Hoo Ness Tramway" in the article. If these are the same then there is a military connection, although I don't have much detail to hand. Gwernol 14:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Could be, AFAIK the railway on Hoo Salt Marsh is 2ft gauge. Mjroots (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Gauge question: Braefoot Bay Fortification supply railway

Braefoot Bay Fortification supply railway on British military narrow gauge railways has a question mark behind the gauge of 10 in (254 mm). No sources are given or could be found on the internet. Does anyone have a source for this?--Aaron-Tripel (talk) 13:27, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on British military narrow gauge railways. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822032507/http://members.shaw.ca/twofooter/ww2ftrr.htm to http://members.shaw.ca/twofooter/ww2ftrr.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228100132/http://www.ngrs.demon.co.uk/ to http://www.ngrs.demon.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)