Talk:Brunswick stew

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

discussion of origin

edit

no discussion? for such a controversial subject?

wcf Facts are stubborn. Comments? 02:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

All I know is Brunswick Stew is dee-licious, whether it's from SSI or VA. I like to think it was SSI since I love the place and lived there for a spell, but if the Virginians need to steal claim to other people's inventions, so be it.

Hmmmm.... My Virginia manners prevent me from ascribing motives to others. VirginiaProp 20:37, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I can settle this debate, as it stands. First, the Georgia plate, according to the site, ascribes the first instance of Brunswick Stew to the year 1898. However, a seminal 1878 Virginia cookbook, entitled "Housekeeping in Old Virginia" (at http://digital.lib.msu.edu/projects/cookbooks/html/books/book_34.cfm), includes many recipes for Brunswick Stew. Additionally, by cross-referencing the contributors' names with their listed locations, the recipes mostly originate from the Virginia Piedmont. How about them peaches? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.243.204 (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

It appears to me that Georgia experts have bowed to the mountains of evidence pointing to a Virginia origin: http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-555&sug=y 70.150.21.209 (talk) 13:49, 13 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

German origins

edit

I doubt the Braunschweig (German Brunswick) origins, but as there is a east european (Balkan) soup called "Serbian Bean soup" or Pasulj - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasulj - which also was popular in Germany, that might be the original origions..

Hash?

edit

I dont have any sources to back this up, but as a proud South Carolinian and a bit of a foodie I can tell you with certainty that Brunswick stew is never called "hash". Hash is a by-product of Barbeque. Its a sort of liquid sausage- finely diced barbequed pork mixed with liver and simmered in (mustard based!) barbeque sauce and served over rice. Its a staple of any decent BBQ joint and a few are famous for theirs. Its very different from Brunswick stew, which we call simply Brunswick stew. Granted, Brunswick stew may be served over rice in SC, but hell we eat everything with rice. So maybe North Carolinians have bastardized the term hash to include Brunswick stew, I wouldnt know being from the real Carolina ;). But until someone can provide a source for this claim, Im removing it. 75.183.147.142 (talk) 01:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Recipes

edit

I sure see a bunch of recipes that stink: I'd like to make a pile out them of and blow them all up. A#1, squirrel is an essential ingredient. Also IMO the recipe is no good unless it calls for lima beans and especially okra! Carlw4514 (talk) 16:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Taste

edit

I just tried it today, I had trouble differentiating it from vomit. --me 23:38, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have made Brunswick Stew for years. I' currently 82. I grew up on Georgia Bar-B-Que and Brunswick. I have a recipe that is over 100 years old. Real Brunswick Stew has three meats: Chicken, Beef, and Bar-B-Que meat. Corn and Tomatoes are the only vegetables in real Brunswick Stew. Adding Okra, Butter Beans etc turns it into Camp Stew. All the meats for the stew are ground, the tomatoes are whole that have been cut into large pieces. The corn used is creamed corn. Other things such as Ketchup, Worcestershire sauce and lemon are also added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.38.122 (talk) 09:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

well, there is no accounting for taste, is there? Bar-b-que meat? Really? what is that supposed to be? I would say you are the one making and eating Camp Stew. Okra, lima beans, and especially squirrel are practically the *definition* of Brunswick Stew. I'm sorry you have lived a life mis-naming your favorite camp stew. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlw4514 (talkcontribs) 12:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:MrsFearnows.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:MrsFearnows.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

U.S. School Lunches circa 1970's

edit

This was a very frequent item in school lunches; probably several times in a given month. It would be useful if anyone could find THAT recipe, presumably made from U.S. Ag Department surplus, as was near-everything on the menu at that time? It never had any okra. I don't even remember seeing any pieces of tomato or red color (sauce) at all. Definitely was not rabbit, but I could not tell you what the meat was. Always served on one piece of toast, every time. This was at a time when the "lunch ladies" (staff) actually mixed and cooked the meals, unlike today. Starhistory22 (talk) 06:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brunswick stew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brunswick stew. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply