Talk:Buffalo Courier-Express

Which paper did Mark Twain work for, and David Gray edit?

edit

I changed the editor list to reflect that Samuel Langhorne Clemens, who was an actual person, and not Mark Twain, a pen name, was an editor of the paper.--24.211.187.175 (talk) 05:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I wish you had cited a WP:reliable source. Mark Twain's page says he worked for (and had an ownership stake in) the Express, not the Courier. (That is not cited, either.) Why does this photo bear a description on Commons (and also listed here under editors) stating that Gray edited the Courier? Why would Clemens/Twain pose with a competing editor? JustinTime55 (talk) 16:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

There is info includable in the accompanying article at http://books.google.com/books?id=OUsIJluiyH4C&pg=PA216&lpg=PA216&dq=%22daily+national+pilot%22+buffalo+-podunk&source=web&ots=u1ymnLxlja&sig=0q9vR5_w4Y609Z-zpEu75aJW2VY#PPA218,M1 Note that two of the ancestors were the (Buffalo) National Pilot and its successor, the Courier and Pilot; BFP is probably most notable for the series of 8 letters about Podunk, apparently prominently cited in "The Rationale of Podunk" by Read in American Speech, 1939.
--Jerzyt 22:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Buffalo Courier-Express. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply