Talk:Build automation

Comment

Maybe the list of build tools should be sorted per programming language. Also, the make-like programs may be placed together. --Philippe 09:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Editing the Build Automation article

I would like to include a table with the following categories: Platform (Operating Systems, Languages), and Description Language (e.g., XML for Ant).

Eddiehu 19:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Best Practices? What is that doing here?

This section seems to be an unrelated list of software bromides. What's going on here? Mistercupcake (talk) 07:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• This article is written in enterprise-ese and is thus unencyclopedic. It should be rewritten. - Sikon (talk) 12:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The Makefiles section needs to be removed. It is uninformitive and incorrect (Ant has nothing to do with makefiles). There can be a mention of tools to aid build automation at the end. Seanblanton (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

An aspect of SCM

An important point that is overlooked by the article is that build automation records how to build multiple variations from the same source files. This is a very important aspect of SCM (software configuration management). 124.149.187.254 (talk)

Advantages and Disadvantages

Disadvantages should be listed too, also questions, why do we need something like build tools can guide us to a interesting question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.97.9.127 (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Major Rewrite

This page lacked appropriate and valid citations. Content was outdated; It lacked changes that the software industry has experienced. I took out self-promotions and added updated content that is accurate and has reliable sources. Kharnagy (talk) 18:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Build automation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123044304/http://www.denverjug.org/meetings/files/200410_automation.pdf to http://www.denverjug.org/meetings/files/200410_automation.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Rewrite

Rewrote since:

• Build automation is _not just_ the process of automating; it is that (the act of creating/configuring automation), but it is the larger practice of building in an automated way which encompasses the creating/configuring of the automation
• CI is not build automation; but build automation is required for CI
• Build automation was not historically accomplished via makefiles; Make is a big part of automation in the past and still is, but I don't think build automation was ever limited to Make
• Just link to list of tools rather than listing some
• The "Depending on the level of automation the following classification is possible" was nonsense; invented for WP

Stevebroshar (talk) 12:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)