Talk:Burns Lake

File:Nechako reservoir.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nechako reservoir.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?

Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. A further notification will be placed when/if the image is deleted. This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Burns Lake, British Columbia → Burns Lake – Name is unique as town name, secondary uses are the eponymous lake and a provincial park and Indian reserve named (for the town, not the lake), target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 03:46, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

• Support. I just created Burns Lake (disambiguation) and looking at the topics listed there, I agree that the village deserves WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status. —seav (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Burns Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140713004716/http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls to http://www.cscd.gov.bc.ca/lgd/infra/library/Name%20Incorp%202011.xls
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130114222054/http://climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/prods_servs/index_e.html to http://www.climate.weatheroffice.gc.ca/prods_servs/index_e.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.northbceh.com/burns_lake/parks/opal/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.loveburnslake.ca
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140721005731/http://pgnaeta.bc.ca/contact-info/cheslatta-carrier-nation to http://pgnaeta.bc.ca/contact-info/cheslatta-carrier-nation

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

What is the population?

I revised it based on my Stats Can research. See the citation I provided.

I checked the citation previously provided for the higher number, but I was unable to find 3,649 on that web page. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=5951022&Data=Count&SearchText=Burns%20Lake&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&A1=All&B1=All&TABID=1

If I am wrong, let's discuss and revise. Peter K Burian (talk) 21:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

News item about the population: Census data shows Burns Lake's population dropped by 8.2 per cent from 2006 to 2011. According to recently released 2011 Census data, Burns Lake's population is 2,029, down from the 2,107 that was reported in 2006, a difference of 78 residents. Outside the village boundary however there has been population growth, with the Regional District of Bulkley Nechako's (RDBN) overall population increasing during the past four years. http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/141640323.html?mobile=true Peter K Burian (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Here is a 2016 news item with a 2015 estimate... even lower Burns Lake's was 1,829, down 153 people; Hall is trying to get more information on how B.C. Stats arrives at its numbers.

According to an emailed statement from B.C. Stats, they take the most recent federal census figures, from 2011, and looks at various indicators - notably BC Hydro connections and B.C. health client registry numbers in the case of small population communities - to come up with estimates. http://www.princegeorgecitizen.com/news/local-news/prince-george-is-shrinking-1.2161595#sthash.cx87VdOb.dpuf Peter K Burian (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for updating that population number and reference. That doesn't seem to be overly uncommon for Canadian towns and cities to have population numbers presented that don't match readily available sources. Some people might see these numbers in tourist guides, city highway welcome signs or other unofficial, outdated or erroneous sources. As per WP:CANPOP, as you may be aware, we should be using the Census data and if we use an estimate we can enter it in the body of the article mentioning that it's an estimate or in the infobox with the population estimate parameter. Thanks! Air.light (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

The Town website also uses the 3,649 number; probably got it from Wikipedia as so many small web sites do. Of course, it was wrong. Cheers! Peter K Burian (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I've definitely found cases where it seemed like multiple sources pulled erroneous info from Wikipedia. I looked a little more here and I found a few sources including this one that seem to indicate that the 3,649 number is including the local First Nations populations on reserves where as the census data is not. The official census data trumps those other sources for Wikipedia so we're good with this. Air.light (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

The population of the village itself is definitely 2,029, while its slightly larger population centre is 2,390. There is a quote error in the ref within the infobox that I am about to correct. Hwy43 (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps we should represent both numbers in the infobox? I'm not sure which parameter would be used for which number. Air.light (talk) 06:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

The article is primarily about the village, not the differently configured population centre. Exclude the latter's population from the infobox. Instead, you could mention it in a new Demographics section (after first introducing the population of the village itself, which should receive more weight). Hwy43 (talk) 06:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burns Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140721005731/http://pgnaeta.bc.ca/contact-info/cheslatta-carrier-nation to http://pgnaeta.bc.ca/contact-info/cheslatta-carrier-nation

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)