Talk:Canada–India relations
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Image copyright problem with File:Coat of arms of Canada.svg
editThe image File:Coat of arms of Canada.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Canada and India relation
edit150.129.164.18 (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
a question!
editI added a paragraph here ↗ after Canadian reaction to 41 diplomat withdrawal. Do I have to reflect it on this article page or what to do. Because this page's 2023 diplomatic crisis section is getting particularly somewhat identical to 2023 Canada–India diplomatic row. `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨ 06:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- update=26 Oct.
- I think we should summarize the section on 2023 Canada India dispute in this article to max 5-10 sentences and people interested to read more can go to specific article i.e., 2023 Canada–India diplomatic row. This will be more like encyclopedia rather than news article which updates with current happenings.
- `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨( C • Talk ) 15:39, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I suggest it's time we WP:SPLIT this article and restore the Canada-India diplomatic row as a standalone article. The 2024 India–Maldives diplomatic row is a precedent for such an article. The subject of the article passes WP:GNG and has received WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE since last year. Keeping the content in this article will raise WP:WEIGHT and WP:TOOMUCH detail concerns. 119.155.181.242 (talk) 16:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think content from Hardeep Singh Nijjar should also be split out into such an article about the diplomatic row for the same policy-based concerns as 119.155... points out here. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. DataCrusade1999 (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, given the latest developments. This is something that can stand on its own. Currently the content is awkwardly split between this article and Hardeep Singh Nijjar § Death, subsequent diplomatic dispute and criminal investigation. Cremastra (talk) 20:26, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed to split. New developments are significant.VR (Please ping on reply) 05:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, given the issue has propped up again, been there for more than a year and has got sufficient coverage. The section had become more of a newsreel and had too much information, trying to balance information on the killing incident vs actual relevance to the relations (WP:TOOMUCH). Given that it is prolonging, it is bound to expand further. It makes sense to split.Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support passes WP:N, so it's clearly time to just do it. samee converse 20:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I had a thought of doing it today, but the proper article title, Canada–India diplomatic row (with en dash) is fully protected due to someone repeatedly copy-and-pasting from Hardeep Singh Nijjar, which had a consensus to not split from that article at that time. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I've submitted a request at WP:RPPD. Cremastra (u — c) 01:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I had a thought of doing it today, but the proper article title, Canada–India diplomatic row (with en dash) is fully protected due to someone repeatedly copy-and-pasting from Hardeep Singh Nijjar, which had a consensus to not split from that article at that time. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I Strongly support the split, as the recent developments and extensive coverage warrant a standalone article.®asteem Talk 00:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. — Ainty Painty (talk) 03:05, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Canada–India diplomatic row, the correctly-styled title (with en-dash), has now been downgraded to semiprotection. There being no opposition here, it should be fine for anyone to go ahead and do the split. I would myself but I'm about to go to bed. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe) 07:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
