This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article was copy edited by Chaosdruid, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 February 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi all
During the copyedit a few things came to light which may need looking at:
"Goliath served there again during 1909–1914, through the renaming of the Home Fleet as the Channel Fleet in 1914. HMS Albion and Glory went to the Channel Fleet prior to their Home Fleet service, 1905–1906, together with Canopus, 1906–1907." - This seems a little strange, the first sentence seems to say that the Home fleet was renamed to the Channel fleet in 1914, yet the second says that the ships went first to the Channel fleet prior to Home fleet service . How can this be? Either the Home Fleet was amalgamated into the Channel Fleet and so would make the first sentence correct, or the second sentence is incorrect and the dates of service refer to their Home Fleet service.
"from XXXX-XXXX". To use them in a phrase "served from XXXX-XXXX" would possibly be read to imply that service started during that time period (and continued after it), especially when talking about plurals. I realise that this is possibly controversial, but remembering that non-native English readers may be looking at this they may not understand the implied "from XXXX-XXXX" means "from XXXX to XXXX". I have changed to "during" and "in". It might be easier to use (XXXX-XXXX) as this would remove the need for a clarifying "in", "during" or "from". I also notice that many of the later sections on the individual ships do not use the qualifier.
.jpg)
.svg)
