Talk:Carles Martínez
(Redirected from Talk:Carles Marc Martínez Embuena)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2pou in topic Requested move 8 February 2021
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 8 February 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was proposed in this section that Carles Marc Martínez Embuena be renamed and moved to Carles Martínez.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Carles Marc Martínez Embuena → Carles Martínez – WP:COMMONNAME is just "Carles Martínez", doesn't use full legal name professionally as per sources and references on page. Ortizesp (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, to match standard naming convention. GiantSnowman 12:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.