Talk:Cathedral of Christ the Light (Oakland, California)

(Redirected from Talk:Cathedral of Christ the Light)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Roman Catholic

edit

I fixed the broken links created when an editor deleted the article of the word "Roman" from all instances of "Roman Catholic," arguing that the Oakland Church is not a "Roman Catholic Church" according to the editor's own definition of the name. However, the diocese itself considers itself the Roman Catholic Diocese of Oakland (just check the huge wording on the home page of their website), by this definition: "Roman" before "Catholic" is the standard prefix to indicate the Rite of the Church. Anyhoo, on Wikipedia, we use the official titles of our subjects when appropriate and in this case, "Roman Catholic" is part of the diocese' official name of incorporation. --Gerald Farinas (talk) 06:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rewrite

edit

I rewrote the entire article and added a substantial amount of new information. I also added the required in-text citations we are now to use in all Wikipedia articles. We still need in-text citations for the previous writer's additions concerning the costs of the cathedral. --Gerald Farinas (talk) 06:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

See also

edit

Per Wikipedia convention, see also sections should only have items directly related to the focus of the article. Just because they are Oakland-related, it doesn't mean it's relevant to the article. A reader or researcher, when clicking on a "See also" link, should find extra information on the "Cathedral of Christ the Light" at that destination. If the reader or researcher can't find additional info about the cathedral at that destination, it shouldn't be included in the "See also" list. For example, the cathedral is not in the List of tallest buildings in Oakland and therefore that link should not be in the cathedral "See also" list.

Also, if the link is already included in the main body of the article, for example Lake Merritt, there is no need to repeat the link in a "See also" list.

The following was removed from the main body of the article. --Gerald Farinas (talk) 03:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Neighborhood Search Map, Oakland Museum of California.

Salvatore J. Cordileone

edit

should Salvatore J. Cordileone be mentioned and linked in this article? im not familiar with how wikipedia links catholic leaders to various physical churches. he is of some notoriety/notability for being a big promoter of prop 8, and given oaklands liberal culture, if he is the one conducting services, that is of considerable interest to all concerned. But as this is an article about the building, maybe the link to the diocese of oakland is enough.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

21st century

edit

About two weeks ago I removed from the first paragraph of this article the following clause, "the first cathedral built in the 21st century,". This clause is not true and did not have any footnoted source even to try to substantiate the claim. I know for a fact that the Roman Catholic Cathedral of the Immaculate Heart of Jesus in the Diocese of "Saint Joseph in Irkutsk", Russia was constructed from start to finish in the year 2000 A.D. and was dedicated/consecrated on the Feast of the Birthday of Mary, September 8, 2000. I was at the ground breaking ceremony in late 1999, at the laying of the cornerstone in March of 2000 and at the consecration in September 2000. Today (Dec. 4, 2013) I accessed this article again and found that someone had put the offending phrase back into the article, again with no substantiating source footnoted. If you are the person who keeps adding this misinformation (disinformation) to the article and if you want to serve the truth, I will be glad to provide you with more information and sources about this. Meanwhile, I will try to take it out again now. Signed: VladCanonRegular, 8:05 PM (UTC+10), 4 December 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladCanonRegular (talkcontribs) 08:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your information is faulty. 2000 was the last year of the 20th century, while the 21st century began on January 1, 2001. There are myriad sources for the assertion you are deleting, the only question is finding a reliable one which didn't use Wikipedia as a reference in the first place. So kindly stop deleting uncontroversial encyclopedic material. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 13:38, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

"the first cathedral built in the 21st century"

edit

The first cathedral of any episcopal denomination built anywhere in the world in the 21st century? Or the first RC cathedral built anywhere, or the first in the US, or what? Marnanel (talk) 01:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Cathedral of Christ the Light (Oakland, California). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply