Cathedral of the Assumption (Louisville, Kentucky) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Cathedral of the Assumption (Louisville, Kentucky) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
New editors.... I reformatted the audio links embedded in this article according to Wikipedia format using an audio template. Do not link audio using image templates. Also, DO NOT link the same audio file more than once in an article. Either place it in the body of the article or under an image thumbnail, NOT BOTH! --Gerald Farinas05:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Reply
Ouch. Was it really necessary to put that in all caps? The phrase "don't bite the newcomers" comes to mind. Essjay 06:14, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
I agree. That was unnecessarily harsh, esp. since the article before these changes was pretty good and the duplicate audio links weren't exactly a tragedy. :) — Stevie is the man!Talk | Work 15:01, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion
It appears from this URL that user:Essjay has edited this page no less than 58 times. As this user apparently lied about his credentials, a thorough reexamination of this article is in order. I will begin verifying this information tomorrow. Firsfron of Ronchester05:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've started the verifying process, adding citations where I think they are needed, but the tone doesn't seem NPOV, and I've removed/reworked some parts. More is needed. Firsfron of Ronchester22:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
You know what the sad thing is? This shows you how little if any actual facts are checked by people here. People fail to look at details and instead just give a superficial gloss-over. This article was given as a reference during the creator's admin candidacy when he announced he was a scholar. No scholar would create an article without citations. If anyone had bothered looking this never would have happpened. This is an indictment of all of Wikipedia. --Jayzel01:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
