Talk:Caught

This should not be the primary page for "caught."

The word "caught" has many other meanings which are much more notable than some obscure cricket play. The search "caught" should direct to one of the other articles and this one should be listed on the disambiguation page. 96.241.24.246 (talk) 22:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caught. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121225124326/http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-32-caught%2C58%2CAR.html to http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-32-caught%2C58%2CAR.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Batters crossing before catch

Is the explanation about batters crossing before the catch still correct? The footnote to the relevant dot point under 'Format' on the '100-ball cricket' page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100-ball_cricket#Format) suggests that the rule has been changed and the explanation here is no longer correct. 203.23.239.198 (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)