Talk:Charlemagne-class battleship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 14:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

• Will review shortly! MathewTownsend (talk) 14:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

review

• "French capital ships" - what are these?
• "but the guns were hand-cranked in elevation" > to elevate?
• "at full depression." - not clear what this means

(will continue)

• • All done, see if the elevation/depression thing is a little clearer now?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
    • • Yes. I made a few edits that you're free to change:[1]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

   b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

   b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   c. no original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   no edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Nice article and interesting topic. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2012 (UTC)