Talk:Charles Brenton Fisk/GA2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello

I will be reviewing this for GARC. History6042 (talk) 01:16, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks; All the sources are available through Wikipedia Library except for the Country Journal, which I got from WP:RX. Feel free to ask for quotations. Ca ^{talk to me!} 03:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Descriptions

All the images have an acceptable copyright. They also all have captions. History6042 (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

You are pretty much the only recent editor to this page and anyone else editing has not disrupted the page. History6042 (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

This is not a controversial topic and there seems to be no bias. History6042 (talk) 03:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I will check the sources tomorrow if I have time. History6042 (talk) 03:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Nice to hear. Though I think his unintentional involvement in Manhattan project marks a dark spot in its career--let me know if anything needs to be balanced! Ca ^{talk to me!} 10:19, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I think it is balanced already. History6042 (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Everything has an inline citation. So there is no WP:OR. History6042 (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I mean OR can still happen when there are inline citations via improper synthesis of facts, but I made sure that all analysis is attributed to a reliable source. Ca ^{talk to me!} 04:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I ran Earwig and it only found some stuff copying this article. History6042 (talk) 14:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I checked the first ten sources and all were from reliable places. History6042 (talk) 14:33, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I checked sources 1 through 10 and all of them cited what is said in the article correctly. History6042 (talk) 18:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I am going to pass this, good job. History6042 (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.