Talk:Charles Neaves, Lord Neaves

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Charles Neaves, Lord Neaves appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Lord Neaves, a judge on the supreme court of Scotland, was quoted by Darwin on evolution, but attributed the concept of evolution to Lord Monboddo, not Darwin?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/July.

Wikipedia

Salamander

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is there a picture of a salamander in this article? --Aranae 07:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

just to graphically link to evolution. couldnt find a fair use image of the other species he quotes in his writings :) signed user\:covalent

Image copyright problem with Image:Court of Session Seal.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image Image:Court of Session Seal.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

woman's rights

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The quote in the Quotations section on woman's rights is very misleading (and whoever added it seems to have misunderstood it) "—O why should a Woman not get a Degree?" is not the last line of the poem, but the title. The first three verses set up an argument for women's degrees, but the last one, the one cited, then repudiates it and gives a "reason" why they are not needed (Angels don't need degrees...) So far from heretical and enlightened, it is the opposite

The full poem is here: https://dvpp.uvic.ca/poems/blackwoods/1869/pom_10456_o_why_should_a_woman_not_get_a.html

I'm not sure how best to address this though, without the danger of "original research"? (though one could argue that is also the case now, with the interpretation not supported by sources) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.41.114.227 (talk) 10:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic