Talk:Lefebvre's Charles Town expedition/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:17, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This is awkward: A brief encounter with a privateer separated the Brillant, one of the expedition's six ships. As is this: On September 11 Lieutenant Colonel Rhett sailed the colonial flotilla out to find the invaders, but found they had sailed off. Clarify this: They also mobilized Indian forces to attack Mobile, but these efforts were frustrated in part by French diplomacy and false rumors of another Franco-Spanish expedition. Was it the combination of French diplomacy and false rumors that frustrated the planned attack? Rephrased all of these. Magic♪piano 12:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Add state of publication for all those that don't have it, and need place of publication for Marley, which should also be listed alphabetically in the References section. Done Magic♪piano 12:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: