Talk:Charles XIII
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 7, 2018 and October 7, 2023. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI'm going to consolidate the tables for the periods when Norway and Sweden were united under the same king. As it stood there was no clear indication in the table that the king of Norway and of Sweden were identical. Similar situation w.r.t. England and Scotland pre-Act of Union. - Montréalais — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montrealais (talk • contribs) 16:05, 17 November 2002 (UTC)
Rumours
editThe article does not mention anything about the rumours that Charles XIII was somehow involved in the conspiracy to murder his brother, Gustaf III, or that he at least was informed about the plans in advance. I would add this myself, but then i would have to look for sources to cite first, I guess. 213.66.231.210 20:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 22:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
regent
editthe sucession-box should included his regency 1792-1796.--85.226.44.74 (talk) 22:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Unnecessary post in succession box
editThe succession box should only include his tenure as monarch, not as regent. He was monarch in 1809-1818, but at present, the box also includes his reign as a regent in 1792-1796 and 1809. This is unnecessary. It is not normally included in succession-boxes. It makes the box messy, as he was regent several times: except for the two periods above, also in 1777, which would make it even more messy. The regency's should be removed from the box. Only his period as monarch should remain. --85.226.42.215 (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
ISBNs
editThe numbers given as ISBNs are not ISBNs but may be publisher's serial numbers. ISBNs were not used in Sweden until a much later date and valid ones have 10 digits.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
These numbers appear as part of the signature marks, so a publishers serial number would make sense. These numbers have been removed from the ISBN field as part of efforts to resolve cite errors in the many articles that cite Hedvig Elisabeth Charlottas Dagbok. In some cases they have been removed altogether and in other cases they have been retained in the ID field. I posted some more information about this in a central location (Help_talk:Citation_Style_1#Hedvig_Elisabeth_Charlottas_Dagbok_-_non-ISBN_id_identified?) in case this affects any opinions about whether these numbers should be retained and/or how they should be documented. I'm posting similar messages to this on the talk pages of few other higher-traffic articles that use this reference to give any watchers a chance to participate in any discussion there. I will be watching that page but not this one.TuxLibNit (talk) 20:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)