This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Charter of Ban Kulin is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Since User:123.208.163.55 has lately been edit-warring to change the language presented in the lead, I invite them to present the arguments in favor of their version here. This document is written in a 12th-century Shtokavian dialect, in a time when there was not yet any distinction between the various national lects of BCMS/"Serbo-Croatian" as an abstand language — nor were any of the standard varieties of the language (Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian) standardized until the 19th-20th centuries, so applying them to a medieval document is entirely anachronistic and misleading. From the perspective of present-day cultural heritage, too, restricting the label to one national variety or another makes no sense: the article itself notes (with cited sources) that the charter "is regarded part of Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian literature", so it should not be presented as if it is exclusive to any one when this is not at all the case. Vorziblix (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
I fully agree. (And yet here I am, having let myself get drawn into it... bleh.) Sometimes I wish we could just switch to labelling things by individual dialect (Shtokavian, Chakavian, Kajkavian, whatever), as some academic papers in linguistics do, and be done with it. Vorziblix (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
