Talk:Protecting and Securing Chemicals Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014

Title?

edit

This is an article about a law, whose title changed from the bill to the law. The title of this article dates from the bill ("Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program Authorization and Accountability Act of 2014") but the law is different ("Protecting and Securing Chemicals Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014"). Shouldn't this article be titled based on the law, not the bill? Also, why is the article focused on the bill in the future or subjunctive tense, given that the law has passed (past? ha ha)? jhawkinson (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 May 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Uncontested uncontroversial move (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program Authorization and Accountability Act of 2014Protecting and Securing Chemicals Facilities from Terrorist Attacks Act of 2014 – This article should be named after the law that was passed, not the draft title that was used in an earlier bill that subsequently became that law. See talk inquiry from May 8 which garnered no replies. jhawkinson (talk) 18:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Polyamorph (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject United States and WikiProject Law have been notified of this discussion. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.