Talk:Child erotica

Request for removal

Shouldn't this be removed on the grounds that it promotes child pedophilia? 94.133.68.129 (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't think this page enables such, but I might recommend moving this article into its own section in the "underage pornography" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totodile493 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Child erotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929120151/http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070503f1.html to http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070503f1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Actual definition

The article lead seems to go into great detail of actually not explaining what child erotica is instead focusing on the use. Under this though practically any image can be considered erotica even that of a child in a onesie. I know some consider it to be provocative images intended to arouse like scantily dressed ones or nude ones posed for this purpose where pornography is images involving sex. I'd rather have such definitions included. Biofase ^flame| stalk  07:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)