Talk:Chiswick, New South Wales

why do we need two ferry wharf photos

Why do we need to have two ferry wharf photos. The photos are both the same except for the fact that one photo has been taken from the front and one from the side. Is it necessary for people to see it from both angles. If proper explanation is not given I am going to remove the photo from article. Adam (talk) 03:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I count three photos of Chiswick Ferry Wharf in the article now, but do not see why any of them need be deleted. The one in the floating box probably should be moved into the gallery however as the current length of the article doesn't really need a floating box illustration. -- Rob.au (talk) 13:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiswick, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121226084727/http://www.suburbguide.com.au/category/home/location/sydney-inner-west to http://www.suburbguide.com.au/category/home/location/sydney-inner-west

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiswick, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120405174846/http://www.australian-post-codes.com/australian-population/state/new-south-wales/suburb/chiswick/postcode/2046 to http://www.australian-post-codes.com/australian-population/state/new-south-wales/suburb/chiswick/postcode/2046

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)