Talk:Walter Cho
(Redirected from Talk:Cho Won-tae (Walter Cho))
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaterialWorks in topic Requested move 9 May 2023
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 9 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cho Won-tae (Walter Cho) to Walter Cho. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 9 May 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 10:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Cho Won-tae (Walter Cho) → Walter Cho – Based on Google News hits, the name Walter Cho seems to have become more common than Cho Won-tae in the past few years [1][2]. (Alternatively, if there is no consensus, then send the article back to the long-term stable title Cho Won-tae; definitely don't leave this at the current mess of a title.) 59.149.117.119 (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 11:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. Move to Cho Won-tae or Walter Cho, but away from the current awful hybrid which is completely against Wikipedia naming conventions. It was originally at the former name until it was moved without discussion by User:Lkwitter in September last year. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. Revert to previous stable title if no consensus. 162 etc. (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.