Talk:Choice (publisher)

(Redirected from Talk:Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MJL in topic Title

Proposed merge with Outstanding Academic Title

edit

This is just a feature of that publication. DGG ( talk ) 17:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  DoneMJLTalk 00:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 December 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved as requested. No objections after two listing periods. (non-admin closure) Surachit (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


Choice: Current Reviews for Academic LibrariesChoice Reviews – Per WP:CONCISE. I'm not sure I understand the current title, but there doesn't appear to be any logic to it.. –MJLTalk 00:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Title

edit

Hey @MJL, I see you initated the move to "Choice Reviews" in 2019. I wanted to state that Choice Reviews and Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries are two separate publications owned by Choice,[1] which itself is an imprint of the American Library Association.[2][3]

  1. ^ Choice Reviews is the online database, while Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries is the print publication that has been going on for much longer
  2. ^ See here: [1]
  3. ^ And here: [2]

Now it depends what the scope of this article should be, but if its the publisher itself, I think simply renaming the article Choice (publisher) would be more appropriate, than naming it after either of its publications. Let me know what you think! Cheers :3 F4U (they/it) 14:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@F4U: Yeah, that would make sense then. The current scope of the article seems to be about the publisher, so I'm fine with a rename to reflect that. –MJLTalk 04:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply