Talk:Civilized drama
Latest comment: 8 hours ago by Crisco 1492 in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article was submitted or expanded as part of the 2024 Wikipedia Asian Month. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Civilized drama article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that critics argued that involving actresses in civilized drama would promote obscenity?
- Source: Liu, Siyuan (2009). "Performing Gender at the Beginning of Modern Chinese Theatre". TDR: The Drama Review. 53 (2): 35–50. doi:10.1162/dram.2009.53.2.35. JSTOR 25599473. "In fact, wenmingxi's debate over the appropriateness of having actresses assume female roles essentially focused on the issue of citationality, with its supporters arguing that the practice was more natural than female impersonation and its opponents resorting to moralistic arguments that held that mixed-gender casting resulted in obscenity."
- ALT1: ... that the civilized drama was used to promote revolution? Source: Zhong, Dafeng; Zhang, Zhen; Zhang, Yingjin (1997). "From Wenmingxi (Civilized Play) to Yingxi (Shadowplay): The Foundation of Shanghai Film Industry in the 1920s". Asian Cinema. 9 (1): 46–64. doi:10.1386/ac.9.1.46_1.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Adrenal crisis, Template:Did you know nominations/Peanut (squirrel)
Created by Crisco 1492 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 715 past nominations.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 30 November 2024 (UTC).
- I'll be reviewing this shortly. SilverserenC 04:41, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Article was moved to mainspace on the 30th, so is new enough. At over 7000 characters, it is more than long enough. The copyvio detector can't seem to do much with these sources, but my spot-checks seem to show no issues off-hand. I assume good faith on those I can't access, including the quotes presented for the hook sources above. The hooks presented are interesting, though I find the main hook to be the preferable one for interesting-ness. Both are cited in-line in the article and the article as a whole properly uses in-line citations and reads neutrally. Both QPQs have been done and everything looks good to go. On a personal note, Crisco 1492, I do hope you end up making an article on huaju in the future as well, because that also seems quite interesting. SilverserenC 04:47, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- That's the plan! It's prominent enough to have a Britannica article, so it is definitely worth it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
