Talk:Clacton (UK Parliament constituency)

It's a hoot!

This article is obviously never read. I sthere any chance that there could be some references cited?

Sleepy places like Walton and Frinton are comfortable, if unexciting retirement havens.

The stark exception is the town of Jaywick, an area that suffers from extremely high levels of deprivation. Francis Hannaway (talk) 12:13, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

2015 election result

Wasn't the 2015 General Election for Clacton a hold for UKIP? The infobox says it was a gain from the Conservatives. (I'm a Yankee so maybe I'm missing something in how British elections work?) Foreignshore (talk) 04:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

No, it should say held, the swings are not correct either.Halbared (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

It was a UKIP gain. Election results are always compared like-for-like, so by-election results are sort of discarded. doktorb _words^deeds 18:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clacton (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clacton (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140910180614/http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/politics-old/poll_is_clacton_a_town_that_s_going_nowhere_1_3760753 to http://www.eadt.co.uk/news/politics-old/poll_is_clacton_a_town_that_s_going_nowhere_1_3760753

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)