Talk:Colombian Navy

Article Name

The name in spanish is Armada Nacional República de Colombia, the article actual name is not the best translation (Colombian National Armada) shouldn't it be National Armada(Navy) Republic of Colombia?Neoreich (talk) 03:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

---

Colombian National Armada → Colombian Navy – The current name 'Colombian National Armada' is an incomplete/incorrect translation from spanish (note previous talk comment as well) as the standard translation from the Spanish word 'armada' is, indeed 'navy'; see, for example Spanish Navy. The article should be reverted back to its original name of 'Colombian Navy' and, perhaps, if necessary or appropriate, a redirect from Colombian National Armada to Colombian Navy be made in order to maintain links etc. Furthermore, it is not a 'common name' as per wp:EN, as can be seen in a few examples: [[1]]; [[2]]; [[3]] Iceman0108 (talk) 08:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

• Support. Move to most intuitive translation, not necessarily the literal translation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
• Support as per WP:COMMONNAME - (see Google search figures below) Chaosdruid (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

comments

Google searches:

• 1,160,000 = "Colombian Navy"
• 45,100 = "Colombian National Armada"
• 6,870 = "Colombian National Navy"

Chaosdruid (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The Table

The pictures and the table create a big ugly white gap which should be ommited. If anyone can do this I would be greatful. We as editors want a viewer freindly webpage and this includes presentation along with other things of course.Tugrulirmak (talk) 18:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Er, 'which' table? (there are currently 3). I do not see any white gaps related to tables. If you can provide your video resolution or such and a better description of the issue, I'll be glad to check and fix.--Iceman0108 (talk) 20:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colombian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724153456/http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html to http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley/2010/ley_1405_2010.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Colombian Navy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150413195638/http://www.mindefensa.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/Mindefensa/Documentos/descargas/estudios%20sectoriales/info_estadistica/Logros_Sector_Defensa.pdf to http://www.mindefensa.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/Mindefensa/Documentos/descargas/estudios%20sectoriales/info_estadistica/Logros_Sector_Defensa.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202121743/http://unffmm.com/ to http://www.unffmm.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 10 August 2017 (UTC)