Talk:Combat Aviation Brigade, 10th Mountain Division/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. :: Spelling and grammer errors in the following section: Lead; Organization; , and red link problems throughout the article. Some of the layout is overlapping with the "edit" fuctions.

   Fixed all of these issues. —Ed!^(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

3. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

4. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

5. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

6. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

7. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

8. :: The following images: 150px and 150px don't have the permissions section filled in correctly. Without the permissions, these images could face deletion.

   I think I have added the proper tags for the images now. —Ed!^(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

9. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Good luck improving the article — Pr3st0n (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

   I have responded to all of your concerns. Thank you for your review! —Ed!^(talk) 22:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)