Talk:Comprehension (logic)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comprehension (logic) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Philosophy: Logic Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Notes & Queries

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Jon Awbrey 15:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand what the illustration with the deck of cards has to do with the idea in question. Is this a confusion with the non-technical sense of "comprehension"? 76.24.21.217 (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic