Talk:Consolidated PT-1 Trusty

(Redirected from Talk:Consolidated PT-1)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Image deletion as of 8th August

edit

The image Image:Consolidated PT-1.jpg has been deleted per category for speedy deletion, criteria I4. The image may be freely uploaded again if a source and correct copyright tag are given, and a fair use rationale (if appropriate). KiloT 18:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • That image was public domain due to the fact that it was created by the USAAC in the 1920s. So now that it is gone along with a bunch of other public domain images I uploaded, why don't we move the one in the Variants section up to the info box? Colputt (talk) 23:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Consolidated PT-1 Trusty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply