Maturity of the article

edit

I think that this article is quite mature and complete, but since it controversial there is a lot of vandalism.

So I believe that it time to provide better protection of the article.

I just Erased two hates comments containing the usual rambling about french canada and Quebec in the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.113.225 (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This article doesn't cover much of Quebec's trangressions

edit

This is pretty one sided by making it seem that Quebec is an innocent. There's nothing on Quebec's law banning visible religious minorities from many government jobs. It doesn't cover Bill 96 which involves Quebec's attacks against English institutions. It doesn't cover Quebec's recent efforts to defund Montreal English universities by dramatically raising tuition for non-quebec students and redirecting funds from those schools to French universities. One would think that Quebec is far more of victim than the oppressor and instigator of conflict. In fact there's no mention of the Legault government at all. 174.89.236.175 (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

And how do you suggest that this would fit in this article? Are valid complaints about iniquities in Quebec policy instead being couched as axamples of anti-Quebec sentiments? If so then there is a place for it in this article. Having said that, the IP blanking your comments as NOTAFORUM has at least some grounds. Your complaints about Quebec being the oppressor and instigator of conflict and not innocent are not appropriate. Meters (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply