Talk:Controversy over the use of Manchester Cathedral in Resistance: Fall of Man/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Lead section summarizes the article, but could ideally do with being expanded.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Additional images might be beneficial, although I can't think of any that the article obviously needs.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Outcome: pass.

Some additional suggestions/comments:

• The template at the bottom doesn't link to this article; should it?
• Consider adding {{Resistance series}}, and putting a link to this article on that template.
• Consider writing referenced summaries of this article for the Manchester Cathedral and Resistance: Fall of Man articles, which currently just linking to this page.

Mike Peel (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)