Talk:Combe Hill, East Sussex

(Redirected from Talk:Coombe Hill, East Sussex)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by EpicPupper in topic Requested move 20 March 2022
Featured articleCombe Hill, East Sussex is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 11, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted

Requested move 20 March 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 06:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply


Coombe Hill, East SussexCombe Hill – Reliable sources are divided between "Coombe Hill" and "Combe Hill"; a Google Books search shows a slight preference among recent works for "Combe Hill". In addition, the hill is primarily known for the archaeological site on it, which is almost always spelled "Combe Hill" in the sources that discuss it. Examples include Hadrian Allcroft (1908) Earthwork of England; both excavation reports, in Sussex Archaeological Collections (1950 and 1994), titled "An Excavation at Combe Hill Camp Near Eastbourne August 1949" and "Dr V. Seton Williams' excavations at Combe Hill, 1962, and the role of Neolithic causewayed enclosures in Sussex"; Curwen (1954) The Archaeology of Sussex; Oswald et al.'s The Creation of Monuments (2001), a survey of all British causewayed enclosures, and Whittle et al. (2011) Gathering Time, a survey of radiocarbon dates of Neolithic enclosures. There's currently a redirect at Combe Hill, which has no significant history and I think can be overwritten. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 18:02, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.