Talk:Correlative-based fallacies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Unreferenced articles

This article was provided with references by an Unreferenced articles project volunteer on 2 November 2024. If you edit this page, please build on the good work by citing your sources.Unreferenced articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesTemplate:WikiProject Unreferenced articlesUnreferenced articles

2004 comment

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article's examples only confuse me... I understand some of the fallacies that are 'correlative based,' but I do not understand the examples given here, or the underlying theme that makes them all correlative based. It needs a better example and explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.127.205.57 (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2004 (UTC)Reply

merge?

Is there any reason these various types of correlative fallacies aren't merged? Would anybody mind if I did so? -Eleusinian 06:11, August 1, 2005 (UTC)

Add topic