Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

1. Problems with the introduction. It is supposed to be a summary of the article. And the main article tag is for a summary of another article. Could you move it and other information about their careers as battlecruisers into a short first section with the main tag (this article's fine introduction could be lifted for the purpose) and redo the introduction as a summary of the article. It would be nice if it could also mention some of the "firsts" achieved by these notable ships.
   • How does it work now? Anything else you think should be covered?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
2. The second paragraph in the Conversions section is way longer than any of the other paragraphs in the article. Could it be broken up?
   • Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
3. There is no ALT text on the images. (I'll pass it without them but hey)

Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

1. • Thanks for correcting my American spellings; I'm pretty good at adding the extra u, but usually forget about the s/z/c thing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)