Talk:Royal court

(Redirected from Talk:Court (royal))
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 88.65.1.58 in topic Dapifer

Dapifer

edit

Why does dapifer redirect to steward? Isn't dapifer a servant that brings meat? 88.65.1.58 (talk) 14:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

I'm not entirely sure where the word "Persian" should be directed. I assume that "Persians" would be most relevant in the context but "Persian Empire" could also work. Will leave it to someone better informed to fix the link to the disambiguation page.--Malaise 21:32, 14 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Rename needed

edit

The name is terrible - how about Court (princely), or Court (royal)? Johnbod 01:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Supported. Let's move it to "Court (royal)". --Bermicourt (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Africa? Elsewhere?

edit

What about courts in Africa's history and other places not mentioned, such as Oceania? Sorry that I only have the wherewithal to ask the question and not research it.

Thanks! --Geekdiva (talk) 23:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:The 'Court of Lahore'..jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:The 'Court of Lahore'..jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The 'Court of Lahore'..jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Court which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Court (royal). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

RM

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 04:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)Reply


Court (royal)Royal court – Per WP:NATURAL. This should be uncontroversial, but just in case... Red Slash 04:31, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Americas

edit

Should probably include stuff about at least Mayans, Inca, Aztecs and Tarascans. - Francis Tyers · 15:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply