Talk:List of selective high schools in New South Wales

(Redirected from Talk:Creative and performing arts high schools in New South Wales)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Correction

edit

Folks, if you are going to paraphrase one of the NSW Department of Education and Training web pages couldn't you at least copy accurately? Bossley Park High School has never been and certainly is not now a selective high school.Detexpert (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would it be better to call this a list of selective public/state schools? I know that "selective high school" usually refers to public schools when used in NSW, but the literal meaning of the phrase is broader so I feel it might be confusing. JPD [[User talk:JPD|(talk)]] 09:48, 18 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

No. Selective high school means that you have to sit a test to get in. 59.86.177.234 (talk) 03:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think that makes my point... JPD (talk) 07:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

My thoughts

edit
  • I have had this information sitting in my sandbox since 15 August and was about to bring it out to the main space when Enochlau beat me to it :)
  • I think the template looks great!!
  • I have been using this table on List of schools in New South Wales, tell me what you think.
  • There was already an article on Smith's Hill High School so I have redirected the one Enochlau created
  • There needs to be a better introduction on what selective high schools are and the system works in NSW.
  • We somehow need to find out the missing founding years

Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 05:59, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Do you agree that the title and the template should make it clear that only state schools are included, though? It's possible that most people from NSW would understand this, but there will be readers from all over the world. JPD 12:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
No I don't believe so. If they are truly confused, they can click through and read the article, which should explain that they are government schools. I think calling it "state selective" is overkill. Enochlau 13:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yay! I beat you to it :P The table looks much better than a list - I like it. If we add more info on selective schools, do you think we should create an article called New South Wales selective high school, or just plonk at the top of this page? Enochlau 13:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't mind it at the top of the page, but a separate article is probably more correct. By the way, I have less of a problem with "New South Wales selective high schools" - maybe because it gives the term its context. 100% of the people I asked in my office understand "selective high school" to mean any school with selection criteria, especially private schools. The template is not just confusing - it is misleading.
An another note, do you think we could add to the table something to distinguish between the ~18 fully selective schools and the ~13 with selective classes? JPD 14:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Yeh, I was thinking about adding a couple of other columns as well. Your suggestion is a good idea - but do we have the info? I was also thinking of marking which ones are coed/single sex. Enochlau 22:31, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I was also thinking that we could list when each school became an selective school. I think we can put enough info together for its own article, with a good summary at the top of this page. What we need is a good history section. How did selective schools come about. Which school was the first selective school? Has there been any school that was a selective school and now is not? Also do other states have selective schools? Lets see what we can come up with. Cheers -- Ianblair23 (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Replying to JPD, I don't quite see the difference between "selective high schools in New South Wales" and "New South Wales selective high schools" :) Also, you're in London, so asking about what a "selective school" means to Londoners doesn't really make sense; after all, isn't England where "public" schools are in fact private? Enochlau 23:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I agree that there isn't much difference. However, "selective high schools in New South Wales" to me suggests a list of things which fits a generic definition of a "selective high school" and are in New South Wales, not a list of things that are called "selective high schools" in New South Wales. "New South Wales selective high schools" instinctively feels marginally better, because it is less suggestive that the term is a generic one, and they are after all, NSW government schools.
Yes, in England public school tends to mean private schools, with a meaning only used in NSW for GPS Schools. I don't see why you think asking Londoners doesn't make sense, because the concept of a selective schools exists here and the term definitely made sense to them - it just had a different meaning to the one we are used to. Since the audience is worldwide, we need to consider how people such as Londoners would understand it. JPD 11:10, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
This discussion has raised interesting questions, and I've taken a look to see what we should do. Wikipedia:Naming conventions suggests use common names (i.e. what we refer to it usually, in this case selective as opposed to selective state) but I'm not sure whether this rule necessarily applies. We might have to drop a note on the naming conventions talk page and ask people most familiar with that kind of work about it.
Although it's an international encyclopedia, let's think about what someone who's looking up this topic would expect it to be called. If the person is from NSW, then all is good. If the person is not from NSW, then if they about our selective schools, then they would expect it to be here; otherwise, they would probably browse here from another page (which reminds me - we should link this from some NSW education article, currently only linked from template and category page). But I did a quick search and I found Independent school (UK), which suggests to me that we're naming this thing wrong - perhaps Selective school (New South Wales)? Enochlau 22:41, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I'm reasonably happy with the argument that the title should use the common name, so that people will find it where they expect. I'm more concerned about the template, which people will come across on the article page, which they may have reached by all sorts of means. Selective school (New South Wales) seems a good name for an article about the schools (possibly Selective high school?). Speaking of that, I will go and clean up a bit the article someone has created at Selective school. JPD 18:14, 26 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
How about this: we put in brackets "(state)" onto the template, while leaving "state" out of the title of the article? As for selective school, is this term actually used anywhere else other than NSW? Enochlau 01:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I'd be happy with that, or with NSW selective high schools. "Selective school" would be understood to have meaning in other places, but I don't know if it's used as an official or common term outside NSW. Considering that it's the sort of thing that's managed locally in many countries, it would be pretty hard to check, too. JPD 10:09, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I'm pretty sure that there are selective schools in the State of Victoria. JSIN 01:39, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Is that what they're called though? "Selective schools"? enochlau (talk) 05:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
I've seen the term being used in the media, like this http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/10/04/1096871811720.html?from=storylhs
JSIN 12:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Do you have an issues with my renaming this List of creative and performing arts high schools in New South Wales? Chanlord 04:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • That's why they have redirects. And Categories are meant to give a list of articles similarly related. There can be a redirect at the current page, but for naming purposes a "List of creative and performing arts in New South Wales" is more uniform. It's just two little words. Chanlord 12:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
  • Both titles exist in the database, I take it you want the one called "list of" to appear on the "Schools in NSW" page. But even then, this "list of" link would appear way below the "Creative and performing arts high schools in New South Wales" link under the "Subcategories" heading. It would be redundant. On the other hand, a link to "Creative and performing arts high schools in New South Wales" set inamongst the names of schools would suggest to the user that information about the general nature of these schools is available in the way that "List of Creative and performing arts high schools in New South Wales" does not. Joestella 12:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

This crossed my mind when I was creating List of selective high schools in New South Wales. I really don't think there's any advantage or disadvantage with having "List of" at the front; I settled on having it there for the sake of consistency. If you have a redirect from the title without the "List of" people will still be able to find your article, so that's not really a problem. I'd suggest that the title contain the words "List of" at the front. That is, unless you can write an entire encyclopedia article on this topic; without the list there, it'll be a mere stub; it's the list that currently gives the page its purpose. I'd also suggest copying the dates of foundation and location from the List of schools in New South Wales article like we've done on the selective schools page. That gives the page some utility over a simple category page. enochlau (talk) 23:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have nothing more to add, but I'm yet to be convinced. Joestella 00:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Sure thing. I'll do it when I get home tonight (at work atm). enochlau (talk) 04:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Done. enochlau (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Preparation resources

edit

Tuitions seem like an extremely expensive way to prepare for these exams in NSW. I have come across one or maybe two web-based resources for preparation, but am wondering if there are others that I am not aware of.

One very nice web-site that comes to mind is www.selectivetests.com.au

The pricing seems very reasonable given the duration of membership (upto one year for complete membership cost $165 only). I'd be interested to see if anyone knows of other such resources.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of selective high schools in New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of selective high schools in New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)Reply