Talk:Creatures Inc.

Pokemon?

Shouldn't the games list include Pokemon? Kouban (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I think that's just games Creatures did the programming work for. Game Freak does the programming for the non-spinoff Pokémon games. --Evice (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

yeah but pokemon should still be in the list — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:15A0:21E2:1D9B:FA2E:E34D:53BD (talk) 00:40, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Several Pokemon games are on the list. The main RPGs are not, except for Sword and Shield, because the director confirmed that Creatures had worked on those. It is very well possible that Creatures also contributed to other core Pokemon RPGs, but they are not listed on their website. If you have a reliable source, feel free to add them. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Mario's Picross

The articles for both game don't mention this company, AND attribute the games to other studios. Salvidrim! 02:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Creatures (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.creatures.co.jp/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.creatures.co.jp/category/products/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010401201907/http://www.creatures.co.jp/ to http://www.creatures.co.jp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:51, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Creatures (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716212051/http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/en/access-map/ to http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/en/access-map/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716212100/http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/item/access_enmap.jpg to http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/item/access_enmap.jpg
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090305192135/http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/en/ to http://www.creatures.co.jp/html/en/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Developer, co-developer, assistant developer

I've revamped the gameography, which was more difficult than I thought. I quickly realized that Creatures did not completely develop many of these games. They are credited as co-developers on several. In others, they seemed to have played more of an ancillary role, and I can imagine their contributions were 5% or 10% or something. Because of this, I decided to differentiate between developer, co-developer, and assistant developer, using these labels to display the various degrees of contributions the company made.

Two examples are Super Smash Bros. (see credits, 0:27) and Super Smash Bros. Melee (see credits, 0:12). Their ending credits list a number of employees from Creatures, but no website ever mentions Creatures as a co-developer of these games (MobyGames: SSB, SSB Melee; Giant Bomb: SSB, SSB Melee). I don't think they should, really, if their contributions were relatively small. That's why I opted for the term assistant developer, not co-developer.

I can imagine there are many other developers out there who play a similar background role in the gaming scene. I wonder what their gameographies look like...

Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

New game ideas

Pokemon World VR so there for I give something I thought of Nintendo vr put yourself in the shoes of a pokemon trainer didn't know if you all thought of it have a good day.p.s good luck Vr Omegaxis1999 (talk) 08:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)