Talk:Crystal Palace railway station

.

Crystal Palace High Level

See the discussion at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:West_End_and_Crystal_Palace_Railway The consensus is that the West End of London and Crystal Palace Railway built the Low Level station, whereas the High Level station was built for the Crystal Palace and South London Junction Railway --Lang rabbie 20:50, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Split?

Would anyone object to these stations being split? Apart from having the same name they don't seem to have anything in common. --Mr Thant (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

They both served The Crystal Palace - the rebuilt palace at Sydenham was one of the UK's most popular visitor attractions from 1854 to 1936! However, provided that the article for the station that is still open explained the former distinction between the High Level and Low Level stations then I would have no objection to a split. --Lang rabbie 23:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. We should also split East Grinstead for the same reason while we're at it. Ravenseft (talk) 21:42, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Agree to spilt, but agree with Lang rabbie they do have alot in common. but for Presentation purposes would agree to the spilt. Rockybiggs (talk) 11:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Disabled access

This article show the station to have disabled access. As a daily user of the station, I can confirm this is certainly not the case. There are no lifts and none of the platforms can be accessed without the use of stairs. Can this be changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.7.33.177 (talk) 15:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Judging by http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations/CYP/details.html it seems that you are correct. Have removed the icon. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

The station now has lift access to all the platforms, although the use of a ramp is needed between the train and platform. SheffGruff (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crystal Palace railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030824224701/http://www.railcons.com/prnewoffice.shtml to http://www.railcons.com/prnewoffice.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)