Talk:Anchiale austrotessulata

(Redirected from Talk:Ctenomorphodes tessulatus)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Suggestions

edit

The species' geographical range is not precise. The "random" phasmid image has labels that are too small for reading, and the legend is not correct since the figure does not deal with taxonomy. Year of description of thee species is missing. In measurements, a space should separate the digits from the units symbol (5 mm, not 5mm). There is a run-on sentence in the Description section. Other species in the genus Ctenomorphodes should be listed in an article devoted to the genus, mentioning the type-species and the original authority of the genus. The word "phasmids" should not be capitalized since it is used as a common name, not a scientific name (such as "Phasmidae"). The word "Australia" should not be italicized. The section on rearing in captivity needs rewriting.--Wloveral (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article renevation

edit

An article renevation is in hand for this article.

P.A.M.S-Phasmids And Mantids Studies (talk)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ctenomorphodes tessulatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply