Talk:Pepe the Frog
The contents of the Rare Pepe page were merged into Pepe the Frog on 11 November 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pepe the Frog article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2015. The result of the discussion was Redirect to List of Internet phenomena. |
Shadilay was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 April 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pepe the Frog. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Pepe the Frog. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Pepe the Frog at the Reference desk. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Pepe the Frog appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Kekistan
editWhy is this section in the pepe wiki? It seems way too unrelated and forced here, perhaps it can be its own page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Illogitech (talk • contribs) 12:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Came here to say this. This page should definitely drop the Kekistan section and probably the Kek section too Spinespine (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not only is this in the wrong place, but this passage both makes no sense and is not supported by its reference.
- > Kek is associated with the occurrence of repeating digits, known as "dubs", "trips", "quads", among other terms, in the sequential codes assigned to posts made on 4chan, as if he had the ability to influence reality through Internet memes.
- The link has no mention of "dubs", "trips" and "quads". The sentence makes no sense on its face (to me... wtf are sequences of repeating digits?) and who is it referring to with "as if he had the ability"... who is he? No mention of a person in this section. DukeOfGloat (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Deserving of a page?
editIt's a fucking frog meme. Why does this deserve a page longer than some historical events? CobGemmothy (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- If there are any articles about historical events, or any other subject, that you think would benefit from expansion then please feel free to work on improving those by adding Reliably Sourced content. That would be a far more productive use of your time than arguing here, or on other Talk pages. DanielRigal (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
"Hoppy the Frog" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect Hoppy the Frog has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 25 § Hoppy the Frog until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Pronunciation is wrong. It's PEP-eh. Please fix it
editPEP-eh. 2nd syllable is eh 2600:1702:5A90:5200:A482:B26B:E730:B654 (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)