Talk:Cyberwarfare
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cyberwarfare article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Help in best rephrasing a paragraph
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello there, I need some help representing this paragraph in a coherent professional way that suits Wikipedia. Appreciate the opinion.
The paragraph:
The Egyptian GID scored a major success in terms of strategic field across all armies around the world. On 2021, Elhamy A. Elsebaey leading the informatics decision of GID, defended a crucial cyberattack in cyber warfare history, with his well generated optimum system, which he did supervise personally with support of some leads in cyber security all over the world as noted by Reuters. Elhamy Elsebaey is a very well known name in GIS, leading the cybersecurity and technology devision in the Egyptian army, Yet, very few information about him to media for confidentiality and security purpose as noted by GID website. Historicalfrubie (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
@help. Historicalfrubie (talk) 08:10, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- For starters, you need references: add the reference to Reuters. The last sentence also may need a reference. After that you need to link to that crucial cyberattack's article if one exists; or add a few lines about it - some details. Please first include all this information, and then revisit grammar issues.- Abdul Muhsy talk 08:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Content on cyberwarfare and nuclear war
editI removed some content from Stuxnet on cyberwarfare and nuclear war. I'm not sure where it belongs. It is sourced and noteworthy, but off-topic in the Stuxnet article. Daask (talk) 14:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Section on Saudi Arabia
editThe section on Saudi Arabia is terrible and needs a major rewrite. For example, it says, "New hard drives were required as quickly as possible so oil prices were not affected by speculation." Why would acquiring new hard drives insulate oil prices from speculation? As another example, it uses the uncommon term "pastie" without explaining what that is. (Some kind of post on PasteBin, I assume?) As another example, it never explains how the attack was resolved even though it took place well over a decade ago and thus has presumably been resolved. I hope that someone who knows about this topic (certainly not me) can fix this section. 2603:7000:3400:69F6:D073:D708:BF6D:F1BD (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)