Talk:Dagami

(Redirected from Talk:Dagami, Leyte)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jerm in topic Requested move 2 September 2020

Barangay Buntay

edit

The contents of Barangay Buntay need to be revised to improve its encyclopedic value. Some unimportant paragraphs need to be deleted.


The Barangay Buntay mini-article has to be made short, because this whole article is for Dagami, not for Barangay Buntay... Stevenphil - Laban Pinoy! (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Private School

edit
Why the private school in Dagami, Leyte is not included here?

There is one private secondary school in Dagami. Saint Joseph High School and it is run by Franciscan nun's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.54.59 (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, as the individual above said, Saint Joseph High School is the only private school located in Dagami. The rest are government-run educational institutions. Stevenphil 08:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenphil (talkcontribs)

Etymology

edit

The "story" about how Dagami got its name needs citation. I'm not quite sure how we can do that as I got it from the programmes handed out during the annual Town Fiesta---I'm already thinking of deleting the whole thing. Stevenphil 18:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenphil (talkcontribs)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dagami, Leyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 2 September 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 20:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


Dagami, LeyteDagami – No need for provincial disamb (WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE) - per updated WP:MOSPHIL. Also in precedent with both Talk:Cagdianao and Talk:Baliuag earlier this year. Article page can't be directly moved because of technicality. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.